Special Needs Trusts- The Basics
McAndrews Law Offices, P.C.

Articles By Our Attorneys

Jennifer Lukach Bradley

Printable Version | Other Articles

 

Special Needs Trusts- The Basics

By Dennis C. McAndrews, Esquire

A Special Needs Trust (SNT) must be considered in every matter where a plaintiff or other potential recipient of monies from any source is eligible (or may become eligible) for Medical Assistance (MA) and/or Supplementary Security Income (SSI).

The use of such Trusts has become so common, and the benefits to a disabled beneficiary are so substantial, that no valid reason exists to fail to consider the use of an SNT for a disabled beneficiary of substantial funds from any source (injury suit, inheritance, divorce settlement, workers compensation lump settlement). Since a disabled individual cannot possess more than approximately $2000.00 in liquid assets to qualify for these programs, any personal injury settlement which involves a sum above the disqualification level for a person receiving MA or SSI must automatically include consideration of an SNT. Inasmuch as the development of SNTs is not an extraordinary expense (generally about $2000.00 to $3000.00) and the cost of the creation of the Trust can usually be funded from the Trust proceeds (rather than trial counsel’s fee) there is simply no excuse to fail to carefully evaluate the use of an SNT with the client prior to, or immediately after, settlement.

The process of developing an SNT for a disabled plaintiff is simple. First, a trustee must be identified to manage the trust assets and make distributions as the special needs of the disabled individual warrant. Naturally, the trustee must be a responsible individual or a corporate fiduciary; where an incapacitated person or a minor is the disabled beneficiary of the trust, the court may require a corporate fiduciary as opposed to a private individual. Second, contingent beneficiaries must be identified who will take any proceeds remaining in the trust after the death of the disabled beneficiary. Third, the disabled individual, the family of the disabled individual, and the trustee must all be clearly informed of the uses of the trust and that the trust proceeds must be used for the disabled beneficiary, and not for general family needs. The family and trustee must also be educated as to the proper expenditures from the trust so as not to jeopardize public benefits.

Naturally, each case requires individualized treatment, and additional steps are often necessary, such as court approval of the trust. Careful consultation between the scrivener of the trust and the injury attorney is therefore critical.

Back to Top

 

What's New
  • McAndrews Law Offices recently won two important victories on behalf of children with disabilities in federal court. In two separate cases, the federal court in Philadelphia overturned decisions of the Pennsylvania Appeals Panel and found in favor of children with disabilities and their families.Read More →
  • McAndrews Law Offices Have Speakers Available for your organization. We provide dozens of seminars and presentations each year to relevant organizations in the field of Special Education, Estate Planning, Special Needs Trusts. Our attorneys regularly speak at national, state, and local organizations such as parent groups, Bar Associations, community organizations, advocacy groups, and similar organizations. These presentations are provided at no cost, are educational in nature, and no marketing of our services is presented. If you would like to schedule a speaker for your organization, please contact Sarah Locher at 610-648-9300, and we will be happy to arrange a presentation for you.Read More →
  • Services for Exceptional Children in Private Schools On September 26, 2007, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Lower Merion School District v. Doe. Read More →
  • Federal Court in Pennsylvania Awards Compensatory Education in a Monetary Fund The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently found that a school district’s failure to provide an appropriate educational program required an award of compensatory education, and held that the award of compensatory education must be placed in a fund with a specified monetary amount for the child. Read More →